Replications

Reviewed thin-film literature records. Calculator-ready replications open with the stack preloaded; records without enough attributable input for a computed curve remain visible in the appendix. Methodology

Loading replications...

How to read a record

A continuous 0–1 score compares the recomputed spectrum with the digitized calculated curve. It uses span-normalized RMSE with a maximum-deviation guard. Records without a full attributable comparison are marked Not scored, never zero.

Documented inputs trace to the paper; Matched inputs use every covering same-material dataset; Substituted inputs use a named proxy; Undetermined inputs cannot support an attributable computation.

Documented Matched Substituted Undetermined Not scored
Hatched = one or more optical inputs are substituted, so the fit cannot be attributed to the paper. Whisker = the worst-to-best fit across covering literature datasets for a matched material.

Soft display bands are poor (<0.30), fair (0.30–<0.60), good (0.60–<0.80), and excellent (≥0.80). The raw RMSE, span-normalized RMSE, and maximum deviation remain visible on each scored record.

Literature records

Not computable from the published inputs Loading records...

These reviewed records do not provide enough attributable optical input to calculate a curve. Missing input is not evidence that the published calculation is wrong.

DOIReferenceReason

Methodology

Records describe reproducibility and physics — not author conduct. Each target is a calculated R/T/A curve selected from the paper; measured curves are contextual only. Calculator handoffs remain available as explicitly sourced models, and publisher figures appear only when the paper license allows display.